2014 Minnesota Vikings Preview: The Best Running Back In The Game

Photo provided courtesy of

There have been numerous discussions around Philadelphia Eagles running back LeSean McCoy’s comments crowing himself as the best running back in the league.  Although there were plenty of immediate scoffs echoing from the state of Minnesota, it is hard to argue that McCoy does not have somewhat of a case for such a bold claim.

McCoy is coming off a highly productive season in which the he served as a legitimate mainstay of the high octane Chip Kelly offense.  With so many online polls taking opinions about the topic, I wanted to take a deeper look into the facts to settle the score once and for all.  As we move forward, Vikings fans, try to stay unbiased.

No homers allowed here.

For starters, we need to admit that the definition of a running back has greatly changed in today’s modern game.  No longer can you simply look at statistics like carries, rushing yards or yards per carry.  You must also take into consideration statistics like receptions, yards per reception, total yards and total touchdowns.

The modern day running back is asked to do more than just carry the ball; the best can do it all.  Just like a tight end might have exclusively blocked in the past, a tight end in today’s NFL must not only block, but run excellent routes and catch the ball.  The same could be said about a linebacker, who no longer is simply asked to help in the run game, but must be able to rush the passer and help in coverage as well.

The debate at hand is focused on who is the best running back in the league right now.  Because of this, we can only look at statistics from 2013.  The NFL has so much parity and influx of new talent on a year to year basis that looking back 3 seasons doesn’t give a realistic view of the current state of the league.

Unfortunately for Vikings fans, that means when you are trying to decide who is the best running back in the league at the moment, Adrian Peterson’s 2,000+ yard season does not apply.  I do see where some fans might go up in arms in this sentiment.  Peterson has been the most consistent in terms of production for a long time and when looking back on his career, this will absolutely be noted.

However, when Peterson entered the league and started making waves, Vikings fans everywhere began to claim that Peterson was the best back in the league.  Although many agreed, it neglected to take into consideration the fact that Ladainian Tomlinson had shown the same consistent production Peterson is now showing.  Although we’d like to, we can’t always argue in favor for those who wear purple and gold, the argument for the best running back in the league has to be consistent.  In my opinion, that takes a look at production from a single season.

Now that we’ve set that standard, let’s take a look at the statistics from 2013 and try to understand which running back had the best year in 2013.  For the analysis, I used the top 6 rushers from 2013.  Note, a player like Arian Foster is not on this list.  Although Foster is a dynamic running back, his 2013 season was cut short at the midway point.  If we’re only considering the 2013 season, his production was too far below the water line to draw any substantial conclusions.


When you look at the statistics in this format, it is clear that there are running backs that catch the ball much more than others.  The versatility in a running back is obviously highly valued and it’s no longer an anomaly; it is now a common reality in today’s NFL.

However, you can’t simply assume that a running back that catches the ball more is a better running back; you have to understand how often that running back is scoring with the ball in their hands.  In my opinion, that is the true metric of success.  Of course, I am not talking about a Mike Alstott type of player who simply comes in at the goal line to pound it home, this touches per touchdown statistic must be used for feature backs, not simply goal line specialists.

An additional metric that serves as a good barometer of production is breakaway percentage.  The ability to take the ball to the house at any given moment is why everyone finds themselves at the edge of their seat every time Peterson touches the ball.

The same could be said about every single one of these running backs we’re currently debating.  All have shown the ability to produce a massive play at the drop of the hat.  Let’s take a look at the numbers surrounding the breakaway statistic.


With these numbers, it’s easy to see which running backs produce the most breakaway gains.  However, if you dive deeper, you’ll see that Peterson produced a gain of 15 yards or more on 6% of his carries, as did Washington’s Alfred Morris and Chicago’s Matt Forte.  McCoy did so on 8% of his carries and Charles found bigger gains on 7% of his carries.

When you take the breakaway gains out of the equation, both McCoy and Charles averaged 3.5 yards per carry, Peterson’s YPC fell to 3.0.  Both Forte (3.1 YPC) and Morris (3.3 YPC) actually ranked higher than Peterson when comparing yards per carry after removing the breakaway runs.

It’s clear that all running backs relied on the big gain to help build their annual production, however, McCoy and Charles proved to be more consistent on a carry per carry basis.  It is important to note that Peterson’s ability to break off big runs is what makes him incredibly special, it’s equally important to note that others are doing so at an equal or better ratio with better consistency overall.

To play devil’s advocate, I am sure some Vikings fans would argue that Peterson’s numbers were down because he played two fewer games than others.  Although that is indeed the case and with the monster games Peterson has put up in his career, you could argue that his statistics are skewed a bit.

However, you do have to factor in health when determining the best player at the position.  A player that can’t stay healthy is not a player that can be considered a top performer at their position because they are not on the field to produce for the team.

Do not get me wrong.  I am not undermining Peterson’s career in any way.  Peterson is the ultimate warrior who would give his all to play the game.  When looking at 2013, I believe Peterson would have played all 16 games if the Vikings were contending at a respectable level.  Instead, the Vikings front office learned from their 2011 mistake of letting Peterson march out onto the field in week 17 and suffer a devastating injury.  Peterson in full health in 2014 is always better than Peterson trying to play at 75% with the season all but lost.

Adrian Peterson is without a doubt in my opinion one of the best players to ever wear a Vikings uniform.  He’s a once in a generation type of running back who has made watching Viking games exciting for the entire season no matter the team’s record.  He has driven defensive coordinators and players crazy.  He’s made unbelievable plays in such a fashion you can’t believe your eyes.  He is the consummate ‘team first’ player who is always sure to mention his offensive line and teammates for helping him find success.

There are likely no less than a hundred reasons to love Adrian Peterson and deep down, I too, want to believe that he’s not only the best running back, but the best player in the entire NFL.

I hate to break it to you, Viking diehards; I don’t believe that is the case anymore.

With new Vikings offensive coordinator Norv Turner in place, Peterson might find himself as the #1 running back with very little debate.  Turner’s offense will call for even more deep play action play calling than Viking fans are used to.  Furthermore, the addition of Teddy Bridgewater might add enough of a dynamic at quarterback to keep defenses honest and pull the 8th or 9th man out of the box, leaving more lanes open for Peterson to run wild.

Turner is notorious for using his running backs as receivers as well, meaning Peterson will have more targets than years past.  In 2013, Peterson was tied for 31st in targets for running backs with 40.  To add some perspective, Kansas City running back Jamaal Charles led the league with 104 targets.  Peterson did catch 72% of those passes, but it was no secret to those who watched Vikings games that the best receiving running back we had in 2013 was Toby Gerhart.

With Gerhart signing with Jacksonville via free agency, Peterson will potentially get his fair share of targets out of the backfield.  With that thought in mind, it should be noted that Georgia Southern rookie Jerick McKinnon will very likely see opportunities to catch the ball and make plays in space as well.

Although this would limit Peterson’s ability to be a dual threat running back, there is a reason why the Vikings used a 3rd round pick on McKinnon.  With other holes to fill on the team, they must feel very good about his ability to add value immediately and Turner must have a strategy to make this so.

Going into the 2014 NFL season, I have a very strong opinion on who the best running back in the league is.  Rest easy, Vikings fans, it’s not LeSean McCoy, however, it isn’t Adrian Peterson, either.  The best running back in the league is Jamaal Charles.  Charles not only puts up very solid numbers as a runner, but his ability to be as dynamic as he is catching the ball and making plays makes him my #1 feature back currently in the league.  Not only that, Charles had the best yards per touch and touches per touchdown ratio out of those measured.

In some instances, Charles needs almost half as many touches to score.  This tells you how big of a playmaker Charles has proven to be.  Not only is he consistent, but he’s a touchdown threat every time he touches the ball.  Charles’ proven ability to be an excellent runner and tremendously dangerous catching the ball and making defenders miss makes him the epitome of modern day running backs.  With all of that said, I’m still looking forward to watching Peterson run through Green Bay in 2014.

Images and statistics courtesy of, &

Show More

Brent LaBathe

Brent LaBathe (Contributor) Cloud technology leader by day, sports nut by night, Brent is a local purple diehard who's passion for the team boarders on obsession. After graduating from St. Cloud State in 2008, he was a contributing writer for and has always had a passion for writing. When he's not cursing his golf clubs for failing him yet again, he's constantly on twitter @BrentLaBathe.

Related Articles


  1. So what you’re saying is, given the choice, you would pick Jamaal Charles for your team over Adrian Peterson? Really??? I think we’re gonna have to agree to disagree on that one.

    1. Well, in that case, I’d likely pick McCoy simply because he’s younger than both Peterson and Charles and I don’t think he’s hit his ceiling yet, whereas Charles is likely there already and AP might be on the tail end.

  2. I think using only last year’s statistics is deceiving. Last year’s statistics *should* be given more weight than others, but it suggests something that is different from actuality particularly in Adrian’s case. Using a statistic that I developed (I think, I’m not sure if anyone else has done this) that translates ANY/A to RBs, Peterson’s rushing efficiency was down 7% from his average *even if you exclude his best and worst years* (those being 2012 and 2013 respectively).

    That’s right. 2013 was statistically Adrian Peterson’s worst year. Oh, and while 7% doesn’t sound like much, according this statistic, Ladainian Tomlinson is 89% as valuable as Barry Sanders, so it’s quite a difference.

    That 7% could mean that Peterson is on the decline… but it could also mean that he simply had a down year, something of an outlier. I think that determining who the best RB in the NFL is should be predictive, not descriptive of last year. Lesean McCoy was definitley the better runningback in 2013, but that doesn’t guarantee he’ll be better in 2014. I think that a regression to Peterson’s mean should be expected, which would have him playing at or near the level he did in 2010 where he had 1298 yards, 12 TDs and 1 fumble on 283 attempts.

  3. This is not a good analysis.

    Using statistics entirely to prove a point doesn’t tell the best story. Especially with a 16 game season as the sample size here, you aren’t given the information necessary to determine “who the best” player is. Statistics are entirely descriptive of the results, rather than the process. You don’t get the full understanding of a player’s contribution to those results; you just get the results.

    1. What other statistics would you consider crucial to come up with that opinion? I think these stats do tell the story, Charles was the best back in terms of running and receiving and was able to produce the best touch to TD ratio.

      1. I wouldn’t use other statistics, that’s the whole point I’m making. I would use tape of a player’s performance to prove a point. Statistics really don’t tell the whole story, they simply tell you the results. If player A and player B got 10 yards on a rush – you would see that as equals on a stat sheet. But if I told you player A broke 6 tackles and made something out of nothing, while player B ran straight ahead through a gaping whole and should have had more yardage, you would judge the plays and the ability to produce those plays differently.

        Also – 16 games is simply not enough of a sample size to perform a valid sample for statistical purposes. Baseball and basketball may produce that in 1 season, but football is completely different because of the number of games. Case in point, look at players like Brian Russel and Michael Bennett., who had 1 great season in their entire career. Those seasons look like outliers on a stat sheet, but if I cherry-picked the seasons and performed your type of analysis, they’d look great.

  4. I like the fact you are proclaiming that AD isn’t the best RB alive. I hope he see’s this. Fuel to the fire that burns inside this guy.
    The best RB? Next question…

  5. A very relevant stat for the purposes of this analysis would be yards after first contact. I have not seen Jamaal Charles’ figures on this stat, but Adrian’s are amazing. And that tells something about how good a back is regardless of the how good or bad his front line is.

    1. This is a good though, I haven’t seen a total yards after contact, but I have seen the averages per attempt. AP averaged 2.97 and Charles 2.22, there is no question AP is the best at running through people. AP also was the highest ranked player in terms of the PFF elusiveness rating, which is essentially taking missed tackles/attempts * yards after contact per attempt. That said, although Peterson leads in that category, he’s near the bottom in pass blocking efficiency. This piece was an attempt to look at the entire picture, not just a single aspect of the role of a running back. I don’t think there is any doubt that AP is the purest runner in the league, I just think other RBs have proven to be equally productive if not better in other areas.

  6. A lot of work in writing the article–nice effort.
    Way too premature to count on Bridgewater–I think you said the same thing about Ponder.
    Peterson will run through the Packer’s D–in another Viking loss!

  7. AP is a cyborg. Saw him doing an interview the other day on the Vikes homepage. The guy looks ripped!

    1. Agreed, if I had to pick who has the best overall physique, it would be a no brainier.

  8. Troubling, but precise analysis. McCoys cap hit is 10mm, 12mm, 9mm, 8mm over the next four years. Charles comes in with 4.3mm cap hit this year (I think).

    Is it true that Adrian’s contract has no more guaranteed money? If so it may be in his best interest to renegotiate to a lower cap hit. Although he proalbably assumes the Vikings will honor his contract and not even ask him to renegotiate, aka the Jared Allen treatment.

    Florio doesn’t seem to think AD will be a part of this team when the new stadium opens. I think he’s wrong, but Adrian’s cap hit pretty hefty. I always justified his salary because he is Superman to me, but after reading this analysis it outs his salary in new light. Of course there’s always the possibility that he could break every record in the book next so … We’ll see but 12mm,13mm,15mm,16mm for the RB position is pretty wild in this NFL.

    I’m intrigued about Bridgewater, Turner, and Peterson. It seems like a winning formula.

  9. Take the analysis another step further to make it more accurate… You failed to leverage in a factor for the defense that faced these running backs. Each defense can be quantified as to how it rates against the run, and conversely the running back against that defense. Then take a value for each time the running back faced 8 guys in the box, then separately against 9 guys in the box. Evaluate the back’s performance in those situations. I would hypothesize that Adrian Peterson would stand leaps ahead of the rest of the backs. Nobody in the league has faced the amount of stacking the box that AD does, and he still is at the top in most statistics.

  10. This design is incredible! You definitely know
    how to keep a reader entertained. Between your wit and your videos, I was almost moved to start my own blog (well, almost…HaHa!) Great job.
    I really enjoyed what you had to say, and more than that, how you presented it.
    Too cool!

  11. I agree with Realistic. No way Bridgewater can play. But AP is getting only who knows if he can rush 1000 yards this year. My be a Cyborg but needs an offensive line.

  12. I have a couple criticisms for this article.

    1) I do believe you need to weight last season higher than others, but focusing only on one year is going too far. All players have good and bad years, and it isn’t all due to their play but rather the team’s, and it is important I believe to look at a guy’s body of work. As of right now, Peterson is still physically in his prime. So I think his entire career is relevant. His 2000 yard season is in play. I know this because nobody would be shocked if he put up 2000 yards again. I wouldn’t put money on it, but it wouldn’t shock me either. I’d be shocked if Charles ever put up 2000.

    2) Running statistics are team running statistics. So many people ignore this. Yes, Peterson plays a big part. But it is so much more than just AP. How many plays have 8 in the box? How many had 9? I think Peterson faces more stacked fronts than any back in the league, so I think his numbers don’t even match his total value. Offensive schemes matter too. McCoy has a lot of plays where WR’s clear an area and he sneaks into that area. For this play to work, you need good blocking and a passing game that is good enough to avoid a linebacker or corner sitting in the flat. I take passing statistics with a grain of salt because there are other guys you can throw to. I also think AP’s career yards per reception, which are higher than McCoy and Charles, tell you he’s under rated when given opportunities to catch a pass.

    You mention the importance of staying healthy, then pick Charles? The guy has had an injury plagued career. Fun fact, Charles best season in terms of yards from scrimmage was last year. AP had more rushing yards ALONE in his MVP season just two years ago than Charles has ever had combined in a season.

    I think that this comparison should take into account more advanced metrics, some of which might be hard to come by. Yards after contact and average number of tackles broken on a play are easy ones to access and they remove the team effect. I think AP will do well in those metrics. Another metric I’d really like to see is how well they do against 6, 7, 8, and 9 man fronts on run plays. ESPN once, years ago, had a little piece where they said AP was averaging 10+ yards a carry against 6 man fronts which is why you rarely see those, even on third and 8.

    Whatever. It is hard for me to be objective because I am a bit AD and Vikings fan. But I really think that Peterson is the best back in the NFL if you got every coaches honest opinion and that is good enough for me. Stats are tricky because you can tell a lot of different stories based on how you read those.