wonderlics

wonderlics

Postby Malte » Tue Apr 03, 2012 10:42 am

Just heard a rumor about the wonderlics being out ...
- Anyway I haven't looked closely into them, and I know they do not determine success at the pro level.
But however scoring a 4 on a wonderlic seems like it's very very bad. Accordingly to some articles that was what Claiborne scored in his wonderlic.
Can thah really be true?
User avatar
Malte
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 6:46 am
Location: Denmark, Europe

Re: wonderlics

Postby Brett A. » Fri Apr 06, 2012 1:45 am

It is true. But I wouldn't buy too much into it... I don't think it's going to affect his draft stock much. I was listening to some radio show the other day and they were shooting off a bunch of other pro-bowl/hall of fame players who scored very low (not as low, though) on their Wonderlics. The way I kind of look at it is someone can be dumb as dirt when it comes to figuring out logic, grammar and math problems but still be a football player and know the game in and out. Is it a plus if a particular player scores well on their Wonderlic (i.e. Ponder?)? Yes, I think it is.

Here's the more perplexing issue: Why did Claiborne's agent ALLOW him to take the Wonderlic test. It's not really required... He could have given him a practice test and known right away, "Crap, this guy probably shouldn't take this test." If I'm Claiborne, I'm probably finding a new agent.

For the record, I scored a 34 on the practice Wonderlic I took. What's weird is that, if he would have studied for maybe a few days, I'm pretty sure he could have gotten a much better score.
"When you're rich, you don't write checks. Straight cash, homey."
User avatar
Brett A.
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 130
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 11:51 am
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada


Return to Draftniks Hideout

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron