I am sure that Rick Spielman would like to orchestrate an offseason that sees the 31st ranked passing game take great strides forwards.  That is easier said than done, especially when your offseason begins with losing two of your top receivers.

One guy they did retain, however, is Jerome Simpson.  Simpson joined the Vikings on a one year deal last season, after his three game suspension was officially announced by the NFL, with high hopes that he could help ignite some sort of vertical game.  His season was plagued by injury and turned out to be quite disappointing, having never scored a touchdown or even gaining more than 50 yards in any game.

Still, the Vikings apparently see some of that potential there, and are hoping he stays healthy enough to be a legitimate threat in 2013.  They extended him to a one year deal, and the financials aren’t yet known yet, but I am willing to bet that it is equal to, or less than, the $2 million deal he signed last year.

Simpson’s signing was basically a zero risk move that gives the Vikings some flexibility.  He could be better in 2013, having seemed to start developing a chemistry with Christian Ponder towards the end of the year, and will get another chance to stay healthy and put together a full season.

If Spielman manages to fill out the depth chart with high quality playmakers then Simpson, who presents little special teams value, could still be expendable when it comes time to make final cuts.

6 COMMENTS

  1. “with high hopes that he could help ignite some sort of…”
    oh yeah

    all i got to say is, ponder better improve a lot

    Like(0)Dislike(0)
  2. Not an exciting move, but solid. Maybe he’ll “get it” this year, maybe not. Either way, low risk.

    Like(0)Dislike(0)
  3. Agree with Tomb,
    Solid move,That wouldn’t be bad IF we were talented enough, to cut him.

    Like(0)Dislike(0)
  4. I just want to see him do one of the those forward flips into the endzone with a Vikings uniform on.
    (Hopefully after an 88 yard bomb from Ponder)

    Like(0)Dislike(0)

Leave a Reply